Industry profile · NAICS 336414

Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 73 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

73
Employers
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,205
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing average 1.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
73
employers reporting
2,205
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing sector (NAICS 336414) encompasses 73 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,205 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.3 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
CA011 El Segundo, CA A 0.6
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Rita Road Tucson, AZ A 0.6
Lockheed Martin Corporation Sunnyvale Campus (1066) Sunnyvale, CA A 0.5
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site Tucson, AZ A 0.5
NGSP-AZ23 Chandler, AZ A 0.5
Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) Grand Prairie, TX A 0.5
Lockheed Martin Corporation Orlando Campus (1382) Orlando, FL A 0.5
AL004 Huntsville, AL A 0.5
Lockheed Martin Corporation New Orleans Campus (1336) New Orleans, LA A 0.5
Orbital Sciences Corporation Dulles, VA A 0.4
Blue Origin Kent, WA A 0.4
Lockheed Martin Corporation Chelmsford (1553) Chelmsford, MA A 0.4
Millennium Space Systems: A Boeing Company El Segundo, CA A 0.4
NGTS-A289 Ogden, UT A 0.4
Lockheed Martin Corporation Kennedy Space Campus (1337) Kennedy Space Center, FL A 0.3
Raytheon_Tewksbury_MA Tewksbury, MA A 0.3
Lockheed Martin Corporation Cape Canaveral Air Force Statn (1259) Cape Canaveral, FL A 0.3
Lockheed Martin Corporation Courtland Facility (1595) Courtland, AL A 0.3
Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) Littleton, CO A 0.3
Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles Chandler, AZ A 0.2
Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Huntsville Bradford 4800 (1350) Huntsville, AL A 0.2
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Palo Verde Campus Tucson, AZ A 0.2
Raytheon_Woburn_MA Woburn, MA A 0.2
Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace Orlando, FL A 0.2
Nsroc Iii Wallops Island, VA A 0.1
Lockheed Martin Corporation Stennis (1563) Stennis Space Center, MS A 0.1
ULA-Denver Englewood, CO A 0.1
Lockheed Martin Corporation HOUSTON-2100 SPACE PARK DRIVE (3537) Houston, TX A 0.1
Raytheon_Tewksbury Innovation_MA Tewksbury, MA A 0.1
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Global Loop Tucson, AZ A 0.1
Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) Lufkin, TX A 0.1
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Williams Ctr Tucson, AZ A 0.1
Lockheed Martin Corporation Michoud Assembly Facility (1336) New Orleans, LA C 0.0
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Country Club Road Tucson, AZ C 0.0
Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Britannia Drive Tucson, AZ C 0.0
Lockheed Martin Corporation TX-Fort Worth-FAA Blvd (5445) Fort Worth, TX C 0.0
NGDS-B731 Clearfield, UT C 0.0
Leonardo Electronics US - ARL Mclean, VA C 0.0
Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Titusville-STAR Center (5508) Titusville, FL C 0.0
NGSP-AL04 Huntsville, AL C 0.0
Lunar Outpost - North Arvada, CO C 0.0
Blue Origin Colorado Highlands Ranch, CO C 0.0
True Anomaly GravityWorks Centennial, CO C 0.0
Mountain View, CA Mountain View, CA C 0.0
(AL015) Huntsville, AL C 0.0
Northrop Grumman - AZ 1233 Chandler, AZ C 0.0
Northrop Grumman - HSV Huntsville, AL C 0.0
Northrop Grumman - VAFB 1555 Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA C 0.0
Northrop Grumman - VAFB 1819 Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA C 0.0
Northrop Grumman - VAFB B1900 Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA C 0.0
← Prev Page 2 of 3 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.