Industry profile · NAICS 332811

Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade

Workplace injury rates across 270 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

270
Employers
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,570
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade average 4.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
270
employers reporting
2,570
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade Safety Data Reveals

The Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade sector (NAICS 332811) encompasses 270 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,570 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Tejas Tubular Products Casing Houston, TX D 5.0
Nitrex Inc - Nevada Operations North Las Vegas, NV D 4.9
Erie Steel LTD Toledo, OH D 4.9
Nitrex, Inc. IN Franklin, IN D 4.9
GA Richards Group Grand Rapids, MI D 4.8
TC Industries, Inc. Crystal Lake, IL D 4.8
State Heat Treating Grand Rapids, MI D 4.8
Treat All Metals Milwaukee, WI D 4.7
Paulo - Nashville St. Louis, MO D 4.6
Metals Technology Corporation Carol Stream, IL D 4.6
Standard Heat Treating Cicero, IL D 4.6
Hudapack Metal Treating, Inc. Elkhorn, WI D 4.6
FPM Heat Treating Cherry Valley Cherry Valley, IL D 4.6
Super Steel Treating Warren, MI D 4.5
Ellwood Closed Die Group C and J Houston, TX D 4.5
Godfrey & Wing Service Center Toledo Toledo, OH D 4.5
Lawrence Industries, Inc. Hastings, NE D 4.5
Glendale Heights Glendale Height, IL D 4.5
305 Travis Lane - Therm-Tech of Waukesha, Inc. Waukesha, WI D 4.5
Peters' Heat Treating, Inc. Meadville Meadville, PA D 4.4
Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Canton Haggerty Canton, MI D 4.4
Metal Improvement Company, LLC. - Phoenix Phoenix, AZ D 4.3
Euclid Heat Treating Euclid, OH D 4.3
Superior Metals Indianapolis, IN D 4.2
Metal Improvement Company, LLC. Phoenix, AZ D 4.2
Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Columbus Columbus, OH D 4.2
CMC Impact Metals Chicora Chicora, PA D 4.2
Bodycote Thermal Processing - South Windsor South Windsor, CT D 4.2
Thermal Modification Technologies, Inc. Tualatin, OR D 4.2
Nitrex, Inc. CH Operations Aurora, IL D 4.2
Curtiss Wright Surface Technologies Addison, IL D 4.2
Ohio Metallurgical Service, Inc. Elyria, OH D 4.1
Zion Industries Valley City Valley City, OH D 4.0
Specialty Heat Treat, Inc. Houston, TX D 4.0
Paulo - Cleveland St. Louis, MO C 4.0
Atmosphere Annealing Bassett Lansing, MI C 4.0
Astro Aluminum Treating Co., Inc. South Gate, CA C 3.9
HI TecMetal Cleveland, OH C 3.9
Byington Steel Treating, Inc Santa Clara, CA C 3.8
Blue Bade Steel Kenilworth, NJ C 3.8
Texas Heat Treating, Inc. Round Rock, TX C 3.8
Scientific Metal Treating Co. Roselle, IL C 3.7
Metallurgical Processing, Inc New Britian, CT C 3.7
Texas Heat Treating Round Rock Round Rock, TX C 3.7
Astro Aluminum South Gate, CA C 3.6
Cincinnati Gearing Cincinnati, OH C 3.6
FPM Heat Treating Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI C 3.5
Wyman Gordon Dillon Dillon, SC C 3.5
Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc. Emigsville, PA C 3.5
DDR Heating Allegan, MI C 3.5
← Prev Page 3 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade?

This sector averages 4.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.