Industry profile · NAICS 334513

Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 423 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

423
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,351
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
423
employers reporting
2,351
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing sector (NAICS 334513) encompasses 423 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,351 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
KDS Holding LLC Gonzales, LA A 1.0
Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence Inc Oceanside Ca. Oceanside, CA A 1.0
Nv123 O Brien Carson City, NV A 1.0
Watlow GDN Richmond, IL A 1.0
S.J. Electro Systems, Inc. Ashland, OH A 1.0
Renishaw Inc-West Dundee, IL West Dundee, IL A 1.0
Fluid Connectors : Hatfield Hatfield, PA A 1.0
Iwaki America Inc. Holliston, MA A 1.0
Mettler Toledo Process Analytics Billerica, MA A 1.0
Endress+Hauser USA Greenwood, IN A 1.0
Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Maryville Maryville, TN A 1.0
MSA Safety Pittsburgh Manufacturing Company, LLC - Exton Exton, PA A 1.0
SBS Cisco - Englewood Englewood, CO A 1.0
Automation Products Group, Inc. Logan, UT A 0.9
Bacharach, Inc. New Kensington, PA A 0.9
Digital Solutions : MS - Billerica, MA Billerica, MA A 0.9
Restek Corporation Bellefonte Bellefonte, PA A 0.9
Pa40 Process Instruments Pittsburgh, PA A 0.9
Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC Hartland, WI A 0.9
FTI Flow Technology, Inc. Tempe, AZ A 0.9
Viatran Tonawanda, NY A 0.9
PI Components Brenham, TX A 0.9
Omega Engineering Sunbury, OH A 0.9
Teledyne Monitor Labs Englewood, CO A 0.8
Northeast Controls Inc. Clifton Park, NY A 0.8
Baker Hughes Billerica, MA A 0.8
Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence Rhode Island No Kingstown, RI A 0.8
Amphenol All Sensors Morgan Hill, CA A 0.8
Carl Zeiss Industrial Quality Solutions Wixom, MI A 0.8
Kahler Automation Corp Fairmont, MN A 0.8
Marlboro Marlboro, CT A 0.8
Omron Delta Tau Systems, Inc. (ODT) Chatsworth, CA A 0.8
Emerson Automation Solutions - Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN A 0.8
Quest Division of TSI Shoreview, MN A 0.8
2967-NY76 Rochester, NY A 0.8
Mettler Toledo Thornton Inc Billerica, MA A 0.8
Coldspring Coldspring, TX A 0.8
Enovation Controls Tulsa, OK A 0.8
Honeywell Houston Technology Center Houston, TX A 0.8
Valmet Florence, AL A 0.8
Setra Boxborough, MA A 0.8
2967-PA40 Pittsburgh, PA A 0.8
Eagle Research Corporation Hurricane, WV A 0.7
Westlock Controls Saddle Brook, NJ A 0.7
HORIBA Subsidiary INC-ANN ARBOR MI Ann Arbor, MI A 0.7
Fireye, Inc Derry, NH A 0.7
UCI Controls Inc dba Cleveland Controls Cleveland, OH A 0.7
Maple Systems, Inc. Everett, WA A 0.7
Athena Controls Inc Plymouth Meeting, PA A 0.7
Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Neponset Foxboro, MA A 0.7
← Prev Page 5 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.