Industry profile · NAICS 325620
Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing
Workplace injury rates across 275 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.
- 275
- Employers
- 3.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- BLS benchmark
- 5,022
- Injuries
The industry picture
Employers in Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing average 3.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.
- 3.2
- avg TCR · reporting employers
- 3.3
- BLS national benchmark
- 275
- employers reporting
- 5,022
- recordable injuries
OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.
What Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing Safety Data Reveals
The Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing sector (NAICS 325620) encompasses 275 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 5,022 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.
The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.
Employers in this industry, by injury rate
Page 5 of 6| Employer | Location | Grade | Avg TCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharma Tech Industries | Royston, GA | A | 1.2 |
| Givaudan Fragrance MTO-West | Budd Lake, NJ | A | 1.1 |
| Bright Innovation Labs OH | New Albany, OH | A | 1.1 |
| Ridgedale Facility | East Hanover, NJ | A | 1.1 |
| Grant Industries Inc. | Elmwood Park, NJ | A | 1.1 |
| Voyant Beauty New Albany | New Albany, OH | A | 1.1 |
| Bright Innovation Labs | New Albany, OH | A | 1.1 |
| Arcade Beauty - SP | South Plainfield, NJ | A | 1.1 |
| Edgewell Personal Care | Ormond Beach, FL | A | 1.1 |
| RITA Corporation | Crystal Lake, IL | A | 1.0 |
| Cygnus Corporation | Chicago, IL | A | 1.0 |
| GSK | Memphis, TN | A | 1.0 |
| Amcol Health & Beauty Solutions Inc | Lafayette, LA | A | 1.0 |
| Autumn Harp | Essex Junction, VT | A | 1.0 |
| Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD | East Haven, CT | A | 1.0 |
| New Avon LLC - Morton Grove | Morton Grove, IL | A | 0.9 |
| Nice-Pak Products | Jonesboro, AR | A | 0.9 |
| PLZ Corp | Chino, CA | A | 0.9 |
| Mane Creative Center | Parsippany, NJ | A | 0.9 |
| New York Facility | New York, NY | A | 0.9 |
| Main Building | Somerset, NJ | A | 0.9 |
| Shiseido America Inc. | East Windsor, NJ | A | 0.8 |
| Estee Lauder - Bristol | Bristol, PA | A | 0.8 |
| Voyant Beauty Ridgefield | Ridgefield, NJ | A | 0.8 |
| Estee Lauder - Greenway 155 | Melville, NY | A | 0.8 |
| Burt's Bees | Morrisville, NC | A | 0.8 |
| Givaudan Fragrances-NYC | New York, NY | A | 0.8 |
| The Gillette Company LLC | Andover, MA | A | 0.8 |
| Estee Lauder - 350 SSR | Melville, NY | A | 0.7 |
| Estee Lauder - Blaine | Blaine, MN | A | 0.7 |
| CB Fleet | Lynchburg, VA | A | 0.7 |
| United-Guardian, Inc. | Hauppauge, NY | A | 0.7 |
| Estee Lauder - Keystone | Bristol, PA | A | 0.7 |
| Englewood Lab, Inc. | Totowa, NJ | A | 0.7 |
| Botanical Extract Manufacturer | Monroe, CT | A | 0.7 |
| Barbasol, LLC | Ashland, OH | A | 0.7 |
| Advanced Specialties | Watertown, CT | A | 0.6 |
| Verla International, Ltd. | New Windsor, NY | A | 0.6 |
| Thetford - Ann Arbor | Ann Arbor, MI | A | 0.6 |
| BTB Consulting LLC | Minneapolis, MN | A | 0.6 |
| Estee Lauder - Trevose | Trevose, PA | A | 0.6 |
| Coty US LLC | Sanford, NC | A | 0.6 |
| Voyant Beauty Roanoke | Roanoke, VA | A | 0.6 |
| L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. - Piscataway | Piscataway, NJ | A | 0.5 |
| Intarome Fragrance Corp. | Norwood, NJ | A | 0.5 |
| L'Oreal - North Little Rock Manufacturing | North Little Rock, AR | A | 0.5 |
| ILIA | Laguna Beach, CA | A | 0.5 |
| Coty Inc. DBA Noxell Corp | Hunt Valley, MD | A | 0.5 |
| Avenel Site | Avenel, NJ | A | 0.5 |
| Coty R&D | Morris Plains, NJ | A | 0.4 |
Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Working in Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing?
This sector averages 3.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.
- Look up a specific employer in this industry, not just the sector average. Look up an employer
- See how this industry ranks against every other sector. Industry rankings
- Learn what an A-to-F grade requires within an industry benchmark. How grades work
Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.