Industry profile · NAICS 924110

Water control and quality program administration

Workplace injury rates across 150 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

150
Employers
5.3
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
4,821
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water control and quality program administration average 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.6 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

5.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
150
employers reporting
4,821
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water control and quality program administration Safety Data Reveals

The Water control and quality program administration sector (NAICS 924110) encompasses 150 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,821 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water control and quality program administration that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Tucson Water Tucson, AZ D 5.0
Cook County Department of Environment and Sustainability Chicago, IL D 4.9
City of Yuba City Waste Water Treatment Facility Yuba City, CA D 4.8
Public Works Wheaton, IL D 4.7
O&M - Delta Field Division Byron, CA D 4.6
Solid Waste Landfill & Recycling Dudley, NC D 4.4
Joint Administration Office Whittier, CA D 3.9
LASAN - Customer Care Division Los Angeles, CA C 3.6
Municipal Utilities - Water Department Ankeny, IA C 3.5
SJVAPCD - Fresno Fresno, CA C 3.1
Department of Ecology Lacey, WA C 3.1
Environmental-Pollution Control San Diego, CA C 2.7
OCWR Headquarters Santa Ana, CA C 2.6
Walla Walla Walla Walla, WA C 2.6
OCPW Environmental Resources Orange, CA B 2.5
Division of Human Resources Sacramento, CA B 2.5
Town of Clayton -Water Resources Clayton, NC B 2.5
WPCA Fairfield, CT B 2.4
Padilla Bay Mount Vernon, WA B 2.3
6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs Charlotte, NC B 2.2
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy Richmond, VA B 2.0
Division of Integrated Regional Water Management Sacramento, CA B 2.0
Water Production - Public Works Aurora, IL B 2.0
Division of Regional Assistance - Northern Region Office - NRO Red Bluff, CA B 1.9
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District Fresno, CA B 1.9
Bureau of Natural Resources Hartford, CT B 1.9
Safety Of Dams Sacramento, CA B 1.8
Human Resources Office Sacramento, CA B 1.8
Air Quality Las Vegas, NV B 1.8
Manchester Lab Port Orchard, WA B 1.8
IRWM - North Central Region Office West Sacramento, CA B 1.7
IRWM - Southern Region Office Glendale, CA B 1.6
Division of Regional Assistance - Southern Region Office - SRO Glendale, CA A 1.5
Maricopa County - Air Quality (850) Phoenix, AZ A 1.5
Division of Flood Management Sacramento, CA A 1.4
South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA A 1.4
Division of Regional Assistance - North Central Region Office - NCRO West Sacramento, CA A 1.3
DEEP Headquarters Hartford, CT A 1.3
PW-Environment & Energy Minneapolis, MN A 1.2
Department of Environmental Quality Portland, OR A 1.2
NWRO Shoreline, WA A 1.2
CRO Union Gap, WA A 1.1
Planning & Natural Resources Bakersfield, CA A 1.1
Division of Multibenefit Initiatives Sacramento, CA A 1.0
DEP001 - DEEP Central Office Hartford, CT A 1.0
SWRO Lacey, WA A 1.0
IRWM - South Central Region Office Fresno, CA A 0.9
Headquarters Lacey, WA A 0.9
SWP Analysis Office Sacramento, CA A 0.8
State Water Project Analysis Office Sacramento, CA A 0.8
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water control and quality program administration?

This sector averages 5.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.