Industry profile · NAICS 924110

Water control and quality program administration

Workplace injury rates across 150 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 131 establishments with a credible rate.

150
Employers
5.3
Avg TCR (rated)
3.2
BLS benchmark
4,821
Injuries (all)

TCR, interpreted

Far above average

5.3 avg TCR

The industry picture

According to OSHA ITA filings (2016–2024), Water control and quality program administration ranks #179 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated employers by average Total Case Rate (higher TCR = more injuries per 100 workers). The 131 rated employers in Water control and quality program administration average 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.6 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

#179 of 540
corpus TCR rank · ≥100 rated
5.3
avg TCR · rated subset
3.2
BLS national benchmark
131
rated employers

ITA inventory (150) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. Corpus rank matches /rankings/most-dangerous-industries (≥100 rated employers). BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.

Where Water control and quality program administration sits nationally on injury rate

Average Total Case Rate, industries with ≥100 rated employers

5 Around the middle lower TCR than 33% of 540 industries

Industries, banded by average TCR

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more industries. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source OSHA Injury Tracking Application (2016–2024) · 2026-08-25

Water control and quality program administration injury rate, 2017–2024

Industry-average TCR has fallen across this span (5.1 → 4.2) · NAICS 924110

44.555.5 20172018201920202021202220232024 4.2
OSHA ITA employer_yearly, 2017-2024 · establishments with >=200,000 hours worked and a credible TCR each year (34 in the latest year shown)

What Water control and quality program administration Safety Data Reveals

According to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (2016–2024), Water control and quality program administration ranks #179 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated establishments by rated-subset average Total Case Rate (same basis as the most-dangerous-industries ranking; higher TCR means more injuries). The Water control and quality program administration sector (NAICS 924110) encompasses 150 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,821 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 131 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water control and quality program administration that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 4
EmployerLocationGradeAvg TCR
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (2)Anchorage, AKA0.8
Illinois Environmental Protection AgencySpringfield, ILA0.8
Division of Integrated Science and EngineeringWest Sacramento, CAA0.7
EROSpokane, WAA0.7
Puget Sound Clean Air AgencySeattle, WAA0.7
Division of Environmental ServicesWest Sacramento, CAA0.7
O&M HeadquartersSacramento, CAA0.7
Sanitary District of Decatur IlDecatur Il, ILA0.7
MPCA-St. PaulSaint Paul, MNA0.6
Public Affairs OfficeSacramento, CAA0.6
Division of Statewide Integrated Water ManagementSacramento, CAA0.6
Air Management BureauHartford, CTA0.6
EECSOWERFrankfort, KYA0.6
Division of Business ServicesSacramento, CAA0.6
MN Pollution Control AgencySt. Paul, MNA0.6
Division of EngineeringSacramento, CAA0.5
Bay-Delta OfficeSacramento, CAA0.5
Bureau of Central ServicesHartford, CTA0.5
Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB)Sacramento, CAA0.5
Executive DivisionSacramento, CAA0.4
Business Services OfficeSacramento, CAA0.4
Division of Fiscal ServicesSacramento, CAA0.4
Bureau of Materials Management & Compliance AssuranceHartford, CTA0.4
Bureau of Water Protection & Land ReuseHartford, CTA0.4
Sims/AycockColumbia, SCA0.4
Central OfficeRichmond, VAA0.3
Division of Safety Of DamsSacramento, CAA0.3
O&M - Engineering Services (ADC 1)Sacramento, CAA0.3
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (1)Anchorage, AKA0.2
Division of Technology ServicesSacramento, CAA0.1
MassDEP BostonBoston, MAA0.1
Division of Regional AssistanceSacramento, CAC0.0
Division of PlanningSacramento, CAC0.0
Division of Regional Assistance - South Central Region Office - SCROFresno, CAC0.0
Office of the General CounselSacramento, CAC0.0
O&M - Engineering Services (ADM 1)Sacramento, CAC0.0
City of Altoona- UtilitiesAltoona, IAC0.0
Minnehaha Creek Watershed DistrictMinnetonka, MNC0.0
BFOBellingham, WAC0.0
Isotek Systems LLCOak Ridge, TNC0.0
MassDEP SEROLakeville, MAC0.0
SWP Power and Risk OfficeSacramento, CAC0.0
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (5)Fairbanks, AKC0.0
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (7)Juneau, AKC0.0
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (10)Soldotna, AKC0.0
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (12)Wasilla, AKC0.0
Air Pollution Control DistrictAuburn, CAC0.0
Acoma OfficeDenver, COC0.0
Office of the Chief CounselSacramento, CAC0.0
Office of The CommisssionerHartford, CTC0.0
← Prev Page 3 of 4 Next →

Nationwide industries with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Water control and quality program administration: nearest NAICS cohorts by rated-subset average TCR and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-industry neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Water control and quality program administration?

Across 131 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Water control and quality program administration averages 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.2.

How does Water control and quality program administration compare with other industries nationally?

Water control and quality program administration ranks #179 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated employers by average TCR (highest TCR = #1, most dangerous). That places it above 33% of ranked industries by injury rate.

How many employers report in Water control and quality program administration?

150 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 131 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.

Data sourced from official public datasets, PlainSafetyScore's OSHA ITA / BLS-based industry database (2016-2024). Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore. See our methodology for details.

Working in Water control and quality program administration?

This sector averages 5.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.

Water control and quality program administration Safety FAQ

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Water control and quality program administration?

Across 131 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Water control and quality program administration averages 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.2.

How does Water control and quality program administration compare with other industries nationally?

Water control and quality program administration ranks #179 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated employers by average TCR (highest TCR = #1, most dangerous). That places it above 33% of ranked industries by injury rate.

How many employers report in Water control and quality program administration?

150 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 131 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.