Industry profile · NAICS 336413

Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 691 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

691
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
9,418
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
691
employers reporting
9,418
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing sector (NAICS 336413) encompasses 691 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,418 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 6 of 15
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Platt Rd (5224) Shelton, CT B 2.4
Thermal Electronics, Inc. Lake Elsinore, CA B 2.4
Kaman Bennington, VT B 2.4
GDC Technics - AFW Fort Worth, TX B 2.4
Honeywell NY09 Green Island, NY B 2.4
Neill Aircraft Co Long Beach, CA B 2.4
Universal Propulsion Company (Fairfield CA) Fairfield, CA B 2.4
AES Arconic Roseville Roseville, MN B 2.4
CDI - Pin Oak Avon Lake, OH B 2.4
UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures Everett, WA B 2.4
MarathonNorco Aerospace, Inc. Waco, TX B 2.4
Gardena (NASCO) Gardena, CA B 2.4
Kaman Composites - Wichita, Inc. Wichita, KS B 2.4
Textron Aviation - McCauley Columbus, GA B 2.4
Rohr Inc San Marcos, TX B 2.4
Intrex Aerospace Thornton, CO B 2.4
Spectrum 183 Milford, CT B 2.4
SNA - Cottonwood Falls Cottonwood Falls, KS B 2.3
Orion Industries Auburn, WA B 2.3
Safran Electrical & Power Denton, TX B 2.3
Umbra Cuscinetti, Inc. Everett, WA B 2.3
CN Aerospace and Defense LLC Pryor, OK B 2.3
Radius Aerospace, Inc. dba Radius Aerospace-Hot Springs Hot Springs, AR B 2.3
Safran Electrical & Power - Denton Denton, TX B 2.3
Applied Solutions Group (ASG) : ANCRA Azusa Azusa, CA B 2.3
Jormac Aerospace - Dallas, Texas Lewisville, TX B 2.3
GKN Aerospace, Inc Tallassee, AL B 2.2
United Engineering Co. Pevely, MO B 2.2
NMG Aerospace East - Hudson Drive Stow, OH B 2.2
Actron Corona, CA B 2.2
Progressive Inc Arlington, TX B 2.2
CPI Edgewood, NY B 2.2
Martinic Engineering, Inc-Tolleson Tolleson, AZ B 2.2
Dfw - Mach Euless, TX B 2.2
Cox & Company, Inc. Plainview, NY B 2.2
NGSP-Y798 East Hartford, CT B 2.2
Bolsa Huntington Beach, CA B 2.2
Triumph Group - Macomb Macomb, MI B 2.2
CPI Aerostructures Inc. Edgewood, NY B 2.2
M & W Fiberglass, Inc Dundee, OR B 2.1
Transland Wichita Falls, TX B 2.1
HVAMA01 Marion, VA B 2.1
Genuine Machine Products Gilbert, AZ B 2.1
D&D Gear dba Absolute Technologies, Inc. Anaheim, CA B 2.1
ILCDover LP Frederica, DE B 2.1
LMI - Auburn Auburn, WA B 2.1
Aurora Flight Sciences of WV Bridgeport, WV B 2.1
J A Reinhardt Co Inc Mountainhome, PA B 2.1
BE Aerospace - Bohemia Bohemia, NY B 2.1
King Machine Mukilteo, WA B 2.0
← Prev Page 6 of 15 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.