Industry profile · NAICS 334516

Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 264 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

264
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,216
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
264
employers reporting
2,216
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing sector (NAICS 334516) encompasses 264 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,216 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Advanced Instruments- Westbrook Westbrook, MA B 2.3
Dytran Instruments, Inc. Chatsworth, CA B 2.3
Radiometer Carlsbad, CA B 2.3
Hanna Instruments Woonsocket, RI B 2.2
FluxData Inc Rochester, NY B 2.2
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carolina, PR Carolina, PR B 2.2
Biotage, LLC Salem, NH Salem, NH B 2.2
TA Instruments- Lindon Lindon, UT B 2.1
LECO Corporation -- Headquarters Saint Joseph, MI B 2.1
MilliporeSigma Jaffrey, NH B 2.1
Lexington Lexington, MA B 2.1
Elementar Americas Ronkonkoma, NY B 2.0
National Electrostatics Corporation Middleton, WI B 2.0
Microtrac Inc York, Pa Usa, PA B 2.0
Omni International Kennesaw, GA B 2.0
Teledyne PI - Acton Acton, MA B 1.9
Mettler Toledo Rainin, LLC Oakland, CA B 1.9
Analytical Sensors & Instruments, LTD Sugar Land, TX B 1.9
Valco Instruments Company Inc Houston, TX B 1.9
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA Pleasanton, CA B 1.8
Gilson Inc Middleton, WI B 1.8
Espec - Co Denver, CO B 1.8
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - Mid Atlantic Region Columbia, MD B 1.8
Parr Instrument Company Moline, IL B 1.7
Repligen Corporation, Marlborough Marlborough, MA B 1.7
Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn Woburn, MA B 1.7
Bothell, WA (BID) Bothell, WA B 1.7
Morehouse Instrument Company York, PA B 1.7
Repligen Rancho Dominguez Rancho Dominguez, CA A 1.6
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. MWR Lenexa, KS A 1.6
Teledyne Photometrics Tucson, AZ A 1.6
Columbus Instruments, LLC Columbus, OH A 1.6
M. Braun, Inc. Stratham, NH A 1.5
HORIBA Instruments Incorporated Piscataway, NJ A 1.5
CFR Engines Inc. Pewaukee, WI A 1.5
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - Mid West Region Lenexa, KS A 1.5
2967-MA148 Middleboro, MA A 1.5
IDEX Health & Science Rohnert Park, CA A 1.4
LECO Corporation- Headquarters St Joseph, MI A 1.4
Nova Biomedical Waltham Waltham, MA A 1.4
Coherent, Inc. Wilsonville Wilsonville, OR A 1.4
MKS Bozeman Bozeman, MT A 1.4
Harvard Bioscience Holliston Holliston, MA A 1.4
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN West Chicago, IL A 1.3
Newport Newport, DE A 1.3
Life Technologies Corporation Fort Collins, CO A 1.3
CT025 Windsor, CT A 1.3
MSA/ General Monitors Lake Forest, CA A 1.3
Cepheid Sunnyvale, CA A 1.3
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - North Central Region West Chicago, IL A 1.3
← Prev Page 2 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Automatic chemical analyzers, laboratory-type, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.