Industry profile · NAICS 924120

Fish and game agencies

Workplace injury rates across 377 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

377
Employers
6.3
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
7,486
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fish and game agencies average 6.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

6.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
377
employers reporting
7,486
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fish and game agencies Safety Data Reveals

The Fish and game agencies sector (NAICS 924120) encompasses 377 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 7,486 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fish and game agencies that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 11
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Parks & Recreation West Lafayette, IN F 12.0
Parks, Rec and Maintenance Shelby Township, MI F 12.0
Parks Maintenance Department Hutchinson, MN F 12.0
Hw Recreation Department Harper Woods, MI F 11.9
Shatto RC Los Angeles, CA F 11.9
Park and Facility Services West Glenview, IL F 11.9
Huntley Park District REC Center Huntley, IL F 11.7
City of Burbank - Parks and Recreation - Community Service Centers/Cultural/Sp Programs Burbank, CA F 11.5
Sunland RC Sunland, CA F 11.5
Griffith Park Boys Camp Los Angeles, CA F 11.3
City Of Meriden Park & Rec Meriden, CT F 11.3
The Grove National Historic Landmark Glenview, IL F 11.3
City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec Phoenix, AZ F 11.3
Dept. of Natural Resources (25) Palmer, AK F 11.3
West region HQ construction Los Angeles, CA F 11.3
Public Works - Parks Salem, OR F 11.2
Annerino Center Bolingbrook, IL F 11.1
DEP003 - BOR-North West District Marlborough, CT F 11.0
Rockford Park District Rockford, IL F 10.8
DEP013 - BNR-Wild-Wet-Mosq-Frnkl Franklin, CT F 10.7
San Joaquin County Parks Recreation Stockton, CA F 10.6
Wolcott Mill Metropark Ray, MI F 10.1
Lincoln Heights RC Los Angeles, CA F 10.0
Parks Rec Facilities Portland, ME F 9.9
Paris Mountain State Park Greenville, SC F 9.9
St Clair Shores Parks/Rec/Senior Center St Clair Shores, MI F 9.8
Mason RC Chatsworth, CA F 9.8
EI054 - Camp Ripley Enforcement Center Little Falls, MN F 9.7
Parks & Recreation Operations Bloomington, IN F 9.7
Park Maintenance Winona, MN F 9.6
Huntley Park District Huntley, IL F 9.5
Washington State Dept of Natural Resources - Olympic Region Forks, WA F 9.4
Hoffman Estates Park District Hoffman Estates, IL F 9.4
El Sereno RC Los Angeles, CA F 9.3
Charles Towne Landing State Historic Site Charleston, SC F 9.3
Public Facilities - Parks Department Bridgeport, CT F 9.2
Echo Deep Los Angeles, CA F 9.2
Parks & Recreation Durham, NC F 9.1
St. Andrews RC Los Angeles, CA F 9.1
Guilford County - Bur-Mil Park Greensboro, NC F 9.1
Recreation Porterville, CA F 9.1
Peck Park CC San Pedro, CA F 9.0
Park Rangers Los Angeles, CA F 8.8
Huntington Beach State Park Murrells Inlet, SC F 8.8
City of Burbank - Parks and Recreation - Sports/Recreation Services Burbank, CA F 8.8
Highland Park RC Los Angeles, CA F 8.7
Regional Parks San Bernardino, CA F 8.6
Recreation Services Carpentersville, IL F 8.6
City of Clive Parks Shop Clive, IA F 8.5
Hansen Dam Aquatic Center Lake View Terrace, CA F 8.4
← Prev Page 2 of 11 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fish and game agencies?

This sector averages 6.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.