Industry profile · NAICS 334513

Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 423 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

423
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,351
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
423
employers reporting
2,351
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing sector (NAICS 334513) encompasses 423 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,351 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Teledyne Analytical Instruments City of Industry, CA B 2.0
2967-MO122 St. Louis, MO B 1.9
MKS Broomfield Broomfield, CO B 1.9
Fluid Connectors : Tucson Tucson, AZ B 1.9
Dwyer Instruments Inc - Wolcott IN Wolcott, IN B 1.9
In-Situ Inc Fort Collins, CO B 1.9
MIRATECH _ Tulsa Tulsa, OK B 1.9
Melbourne DFS Melbourne, FL B 1.9
Richmond, IL Richmond, IL B 1.9
093 La Porte, TX (VEC) La Porte, TX B 1.9
WIKA Instrument LP Lawrenceville, GA B 1.8
Ca147 Surface Vision Hayward, CA B 1.8
Mikron Valve & Manufacturer Erie, PA B 1.8
Motion Sensors, Inc. Elizabeth City, NC B 1.8
OnPoint Digital Solutions, LLC Louisville, CO B 1.8
EControls San Antonio, TX B 1.8
The Fredericks Company Inc Huntingdon Valley, PA B 1.8
Building Automation Products Inc Gays Mills, WI B 1.7
Heatcon Composite Systems, Inc. Tukwila, WA B 1.7
Gp 50 New York Ltd Divi Grand Island, NY B 1.7
Dwyer Instruments Inc - Grandview MO Grandview, MO B 1.7
HORIBA Automotive Troy Troy, MI B 1.7
ATI Industrial Automation Apex, NC B 1.7
2967-NH115 Milford, NH B 1.7
Conax Technologies (Buffalo) Buffalo, NY B 1.7
Clark Reliance Strongsville, OH B 1.7
Taylor Water Technologies - Main Sparks, MD B 1.7
2967-NV123 Carson City, NV B 1.7
TMCO Operating Wewoka, OK B 1.7
Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI Auburn Hills, MI B 1.7
IDEX Corp Middleboro, MA B 1.7
Emerson Automation Solutions - Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, MN B 1.7
Phoseon Technology, Inc. Hillsboro, OR B 1.7
Gayesco-Wika Lp Pasadena, TX A 1.6
Hexagon Metrology, Inc. No Kingstown, RI A 1.6
RJG, Inc. - Corporate Traverse City, MI A 1.6
Electro-Sensors, Inc. Minnetonka, MN A 1.5
Erhardt + Leimer Inc. Duncan, SC A 1.5
The Nason Company Walhalla, SC A 1.5
Gems Sensors Plainville Plainville, CT A 1.5
Junge Control, Inc. Cedar Rapids, IA A 1.5
Complete Automation Lake Orion, MI A 1.5
Veolia WTS Analytical Instruments, Inc. Boulder, CO A 1.5
Quest-Tec Solutions, Inc. Houston, TX A 1.5
Ichor Systems - Austin Austin, TX A 1.5
Rj Global Wika Houston, TX A 1.5
Warren Warren, NJ A 1.4
Thermometrics Corporation Northridge, CA A 1.4
2967-CO64 Grand Junction, CO A 1.4
SJE-Rhombus New Hope, MN A 1.4
← Prev Page 3 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.