Industry profile · NAICS 488190

Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)

Workplace injury rates across 1,087 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,087
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
17,239
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
1,087
employers reporting
17,239
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) sector (NAICS 488190) encompasses 1,087 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 17,239 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 15 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
SFS Van Nuys-077VNY Van Nuys, CA A 1.9
John Bean Technologies Corporation RDU Morrisville, NC A 1.9
Aerotronics Inc Billings, MT A 1.9
FL026 Hurlburt Field, FL A 1.9
VT Mobile Aerospace Engineering, Inc Mobile, AL A 1.9
John Bean Technologies Corporation PHX-BHS Phoenix, AZ A 1.9
Textron Aviation - HBS Wichita Wichita, KS A 1.9
NE001 Offutt Afb, NE A 1.9
DI - T44/34/6 CLS NAS Whiting Field Milton, FL A 1.9
John Bean Technologies Corporation IAH Houston, TX A 1.9
JFK Jamaica, NY A 1.9
Xtreme Aviation LLC OPF Opa Locka, FL A 1.9
CLE Cleveland, OH A 1.9
Textron Systems - ATAC ACE Haslet, TX A 1.9
Textron Aviation- CSC Sacramento Sacramento, CA A 1.9
DFC, Inc dba Advanced Helicopter Services Woodland, CA A 1.9
ACS_OKC_OK Oklahoma City, OK A 1.9
345 Corpus Christi, TX A 1.8
Triumph Airborne Structures Hot Springs National Park, AR A 1.8
Signature Flight Support Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL A 1.8
Learjet Inc. - Dallas Service Center Dallas, TX A 1.8
Trace Aviation Jackson, MS A 1.8
SFS San Antonio, TX-074SAT San Antonio, TX A 1.8
Lockheed Martin Corporation Tucson AZ - Air Grd Way (2579) Tucson, AZ A 1.8
Silver Wings Aerospace Princeton, FL A 1.8
Txsti - San Antonio Gateway San Antonio, TX A 1.8
Embraer Executive Jet Services LLC IWA Mesa, AZ A 1.8
MS - Wahiawa, HI - 5AFW3 Wahiawa, HI A 1.8
Signature Flight Support Santa Fe Santa Fe,, NM A 1.8
C3 ISR Services-OKC Oklahoma City, OK A 1.8
NGDS-D025 Beaufort, SC A 1.8
MS - Oar Harbor, WA - 5WYWA Oar Harbor, WA A 1.8
Ok96 Ametek Drake Air Tulsa, OK A 1.8
Bombardier Commercial Service Center - Tucson Tucson, AZ A 1.8
BNA Nashville, TN A 1.8
Signature Flight Support Lihue Lihue, HI A 1.8
Chromalloy New York Orangeburg, NY A 1.8
Nyaco - Albany Gateway Latham, NY A 1.8
Signature Flight Support Greensboro MRO Greensboro, NC A 1.7
Jetport Road Brunswick, GA A 1.7
Lga Laguardia Airport Queens, NY A 1.7
AeroVision International Muskegon, MI A 1.7
MD004 Patuxent River, MD A 1.7
DI - Army CLS Ft Belvoir Fort Belvoir, VA A 1.7
MS - Norfolk, VA - 5NFV1 Norfolk, VA A 1.7
NorthStar Technologies Warehouse Bridgeport, WV A 1.7
Embraer Executive Jet Services LLC. Fort Lauderdale, FL A 1.7
Signature Flight Support Houston-Ellington Houston-Ellington, TX A 1.7
SFS Morristown-267MMU Morristown, NJ A 1.7
Embraer Executive Jets Services, LLC - FLL - CS Hollywood, FL A 1.7
← Prev Page 15 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.