Industry profile · NAICS 488190

Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)

Workplace injury rates across 1,087 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,087
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
17,239
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
1,087
employers reporting
17,239
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) sector (NAICS 488190) encompasses 1,087 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 17,239 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 14 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Goodrich Corporation (Louisville KY) Louisville, KY A 2.2
973and995 Whiting Field Nas, FL A 2.2
Signature Flight Support Seattle Seattle, WA A 2.2
MRK Aviation.com Elyria, OH A 2.2
2073-SW-20730039-MX Houston, TX A 2.2
Lockheed Martin Corporation US AZ Yuma 151 O'Neill St (1250) Yuma, AZ A 2.2
DI - Army CLS Ft Worth Fort Worth, TX A 2.2
SFS 641MKC Kansas City Kansas City, MO A 2.2
DenMar Services Inc. Lawton, OK A 2.1
SFS-203IAD-TechnicAir Dulles, VA A 2.1
ORD-FFM Chicago, IL A 2.1
Sfocmb201 Sfo - B201 San Francisco, CA A 2.1
2073-SW-20730026-MX Dallas, TX A 2.1
989 Nas Pensacola, FL A 2.1
2073-EJ-20730195-MX Richmond, VA A 2.1
Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) Ft. Lauderdale, FL A 2.1
GLST1 Minot Afb, ND A 2.1
Cherokee Nation Aerospace and Defense-Annville Annville, PA A 2.1
NGDS-B102 Lake Charles, LA A 2.1
Textron Aviation Greensboro Service Center Greensboro, NC A 2.1
Learjet Inc. - Florida Service Center Fort Lauderdale, FL A 2.1
PBI West Palm Beach, FL A 2.1
Constant Aviation- CLM, Cleveland Hopkins Airport Cleveland, OH A 2.1
8 - Army C-12 Lccs Site 510 Fort Huachuca, Az Fort Huachuca, AZ A 2.1
LGS_FL Miami, FL A 2.1
Naples Jet Center Holdings Naples, FL A 2.0
SRQ-FFM Sarasota, FL A 2.0
Learjet Inc. Opa Locka Opa Locka, FL A 2.0
North State Aviation Winston Salem, NC A 2.0
9123-Sjc-Prime Appearance San Jose, CA A 2.0
Chromalloy Georgia Newnan, GA A 2.0
Textron Aviation - CSC Orlando Orlando, FL A 2.0
Lockheed Martin Corporation Cecil Commerce Center (3321) Jacksonville, FL A 2.0
839 Tinker Afb, OK A 2.0
John Bean Technologies Corporation MIA Miami, FL A 2.0
Constant Aviation- SFB Sanford, FL A 2.0
Learjet Inc. - Hartford Service Center Windsor Locks, CT A 2.0
DI - AFM East Ft Polk Ft Polk, LA A 2.0
John Bean Technologies Corporation DFW-D Dfw, TX A 2.0
ATL-ITP East Point, GA A 2.0
StandardAero - Houston Houston, TX A 2.0
Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin Air Force Base (1515) Eglin Air Force Base, FL A 1.9
Lockheed Martin Corporation US NV Fallon Pasture Rd (1585) Fallon, NV A 1.9
Elliott Aviation DSM Des Moines, IA A 1.9
Kirtland Helo Mx Albuquerque, NM A 1.9
SFS Denver-283DEN Denver, CO A 1.9
SFS Indianapolis-285IND Indianapolis, IN A 1.9
Mission Aviation Fellowship Nampa, ID A 1.9
John Bean Technologies Corporation SNA Santa Ana, CA A 1.9
Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services, LLC - LVN La Vergne, TN A 1.9
← Prev Page 14 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.