Industry profile · NAICS 485111

Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination)

Workplace injury rates across 386 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

386
Employers
6.8
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
19,501
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) average 6.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

6.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
386
employers reporting
19,501
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) Safety Data Reveals

The Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) sector (NAICS 485111) encompasses 386 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 19,501 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.8 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 6 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Location 64 Los Angeles, CA C 5.0
Cedar Rapids, IA - Prairie Valley Court Cedar Rapids, IA C 4.9
Metro Transit South Garage Minneapolis, MN C 4.9
Location 66 Los Angeles, CA C 4.9
First Transit Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, CA C 4.9
2210 Brown Line Support Chicago, IL C 4.8
1953-2211 Chicago, IL C 4.8
Winchester, Va - Tyson Dr Winchester, VA C 4.8
2411 Overhaul Modification Skokie, IL C 4.8
Location 61 Los Angeles, CA C 4.8
City of Albany Public Works-Transit Albany, OR C 4.7
RydeTrans Stockton d.b.a. RTD Stockton, CA C 4.7
Kennesaw, GA- Cobb Place Kennesaw, GA C 4.7
Hampton (Victoria Blvd) Hampton, VA C 4.7
Metro Transit Nicollet Garage Minneapolis, MN C 4.6
57209 Cortland Transit Cortland, NY C 4.6
1152 Kedzie Maintenance Chicago, IL C 4.6
Location 30 Los Angeles, CA C 4.6
Springdale, AR -- Johnson Road Springdale, AR C 4.5
4111 Signal Maintenance Chicago, IL C 4.5
7901 Bus Btra Cinderbed Trans Lorton, VA C 4.4
1343 Mechanical a Chicago, IL C 4.4
Tracy, CA - N McCarthur Dr Tracy, CA C 4.4
Bethlehem, PA-Hanoverville Rd Bethlehem, PA C 4.4
55625 Rutgers North Brunswick, NJ C 4.3
Harrisburg, PA - Sycamore Street Maintenance Shop Harrisburg, PA C 4.3
Mason Transit Authority Shelton, WA C 4.3
North Tonawanda, NY-Shawnee Road North Tonawanda, NY C 4.3
1953-1003 Chicago, IL C 4.3
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center Minneapolis, MN C 4.3
Western Piedmont Regional Transit Authority Conover, NC C 4.3
55883 Sussex Georgetown, DE C 4.2
Mangrove Hampton, VA C 4.2
Shady Grove Rail Yard Rockville, MD C 4.2
Glenmont Rail Division Silver Spring, MD C 4.1
55600 OCTA Irvine Irvine, CA C 4.1
METRO Cincinnati, OH C 4.0
Branch Avenue Rail Yard Suitland, MD C 4.0
Coleman Place Hampton, VA C 3.9
New Carrollton Rail Yard Hyattsville, MD C 3.9
1953-7455 Skokie, IL C 3.9
Western Transit Systems Garden Grove, CA C 3.9
Orlando, FL - Transport Drive Orlando, FL C 3.8
4252 Rail Station Mgt Support Ryp Chicago, IL C 3.8
Location 63 Los Angeles, CA C 3.8
Metro Transit Light Rail Operations and Maintenance Minneapolis, MN C 3.7
Jacksonville, FL - Alvarez Road Jacksonville, FL C 3.6
55621 Nysdot H.E.L.P. Horseheads, NY C 3.6
1101 Administration Urbana, IL B 3.6
55595 Rpta Tempe, AZ B 3.6
← Prev Page 6 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination)?

This sector averages 6.8 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.