Industry profile · NAICS 237990

Earth retention system construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,045 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,045
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
7,463
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Earth retention system construction average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,045
employers reporting
7,463
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Earth retention system construction Safety Data Reveals

The Earth retention system construction sector (NAICS 237990) encompasses 1,045 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 7,463 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Earth retention system construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 19 of 28
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
103176 - E360 Bellevue to Redmond Redmond, WA A 0.1
Orlando Utility Commission Orlando, FL A 0.1
Total LP La Porte, TX A 0.1
Cianbro Constructors LLC Brewer, ME A 0.1
Turner at Shell Convent LA Convent, LA A 0.1
104179 - Federal Way Link Extension Federal Way, WA A 0.1
Total BP Pasadena, TX A 0.1
Covestro Baytown, TX A 0.1
DUKE-ASHEVILLE Arden, NC A 0.1
TIM at CF Industries Donaldsonville LA Donaldsonville, LA A 0.1
Tellepsen Industrial Pasadena, TX A 0.1
Turner at Olin Corporation Freeport TX Freeport, TX A 0.1
Turner at Phillips 66 Westlake LA Westlake, LA A 0.1
Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project Cameron, LA A 0.1
PCE Constructors, Inc. Prairieville, LA A 0.1
Shell Chemical LP Deer Park TX Deer Park, TX A 0.1
Lyondell Basell CVO N Channelview, TX A 0.1
Phillips 66 Westlake LA Westlake, LA A 0.1
Turner at Amec Foster Wheeler Gregory TX Gregory, TX A 0.1
Turner at Formosa Plastics Corporation Point Comfort TX Point Comfort, TX A 0.1
Turner at Olin Chlor Alkali Products Freeport TX Freeport, TX A 0.1
Turner at Shell / Motiva Enterprises LLC Norco LA Norco, LA A 0.1
Turner at Shell Chemcial LP Deer Park TX Deer Park, TX A 0.1
United Construction Co Inc Parkersburg, WV A 0.1
Pipe Fabrication Baton Rouge LA Port Allen, LA A 0.1
Lyondell Basell LPO La Porte, TX A 0.1
Cianbro Corporate Pittsfield, ME A 0.1
Olin Corporation Freeport TX Freeport, TX A 0.1
Standard Constructors, Inc. Houston, TX A 0.1
Shell/Motiva Enterprises Norco LA Norco, LA A 0.1
Turner at Sasol North America Westlake LA Westlake, LA A 0.1
The Goettle Company Cincinnati, OH A 0.1
Brandenburg Drainage Inc Maquoketa, IA C 0.0
Cfi Construction, Inc. Johnstown, NY C 0.0
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority - Metrorail Project Dulles, VA C 0.0
CLMM Jacksonville, FL C 0.0
Railroad Construction Co., Inc. -Paterson Paterson, NJ C 0.0
E.C. Korneffel Company Trenton, MI C 0.0
Cal Boring Anaheim, CA C 0.0
Stacy and Witbeck, Inc. - Corporate Office Alameda, CA C 0.0
E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. Martinez, CA C 0.0
FERMA Industrial Services Newark, CA C 0.0
103751 - Mud Mountain Dam Buckley, WA C 0.0
104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR Phoenix, AZ C 0.0
Ballard - Corp/NW/HSD Washougal, WA C 0.0
Hitachi Rail Baltimore Establishment Owings Mills, MD C 0.0
Water Resources Group Deerwood, MN C 0.0
Fleming Excavating Inc Decatur, IN C 0.0
Penn II Widening Skanska Penn Station Construction JV 90008290 New York, NY C 0.0
Ballard - Southwest Loomis, CA C 0.0
← Prev Page 19 of 28 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Earth retention system construction?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.