Industry profile · NAICS 488190

Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)

Workplace injury rates across 1,087 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,087
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
17,239
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
1,087
employers reporting
17,239
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) sector (NAICS 488190) encompasses 1,087 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 17,239 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 8 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
SFS-274BED Bedford, MA C 4.3
2073-EJ-20730180-MX Houston, TX C 4.3
Elp El Paso International Airport El Paso, TX C 4.3
BWI Baltimore, MD C 4.3
Nyhan - Syracuse Air Ramp North Syracuse, NY C 4.3
UTAS- Louisville Service Center Louisville, KY C 4.3
PHL Philadelphia, PA C 4.3
9123-Pbi-Prime Appearance West Palm Beach, FL C 4.3
Diversified Services, Inc. Wichita, KS C 4.3
SFS Dulles-202IAD Dulles, VA C 4.2
ISP Ronkonkoma, NY C 4.2
Goodrich Corporation (Louisville) Louisville, KY C 4.2
2073-SW-20730010-MX Nashville, TN C 4.2
DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield Savannah, GA C 4.2
BDL-ITP Windsor Locks, CT C 4.2
312 - Lft Lafayette, LA C 4.2
HAECO Americas - LCQ Lake City, FL C 4.2
ATL Atlanta, GA C 4.2
2073-SW-20730030-MX Fresno, CA C 4.2
Gama Aviation Engineering (TEB) Teterboro, NJ C 4.2
2073-EJ-20730198-MX Shreveport, LA C 4.2
Banyan Air Services, Inc Fort Lauderdale, FL C 4.2
DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - China Lake China Lake, CA C 4.2
IAH Houston, TX C 4.1
Air Bear Aviation Bedford, MA C 4.1
Sw-20730025-Mx Den - Denver, Co Denver, CO C 4.1
TPA-GH Tampa, FL C 4.1
2073-SW-20730207-MX Minneapolis, MN C 4.1
Cft Ellsworth Afb, Sd Ellsworth Afb, SD C 4.1
SFS Dallas-282DAL Dallas, TX C 4.1
Signature Flight Support Laredo Laredo, TX C 4.1
905 Madison, MS C 4.1
5319_15015 West Palm Beach, FL C 4.1
SJC San Jose, CA C 4.1
2073-SW-20730072-MX San Francisco, CA C 4.1
Wysong Enterprises, Inc. Blountville, TN C 4.1
2073-EJ-20730203-MX Alcoa, TN C 4.0
DEN Denver, CO C 4.0
HAECO Special Services Greensboro, NC C 4.0
Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services Inc Macon, GA C 4.0
Signature Flight Support Miami Miami, FL C 4.0
DI - NAWDC Fallon Fallon, NV C 4.0
Signature Flight Support Greensboro Greensboro, NC C 4.0
Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC Anchorage, AK C 4.0
Tomcat 1720 Midwest City, OK C 4.0
Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services Inc. Nashville, TN C 4.0
Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, CVG, Cincinnati N KY Airport Erlanger, KY C 4.0
Flightstar Aircraft Services, LLC Jacksonville, FL C 3.9
ONT-ITP Ontario, CA C 3.9
Kyalh - Upsco Airline Hangar Louisville, KY C 3.9
← Prev Page 8 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.