Industry profile · NAICS 488190

Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)

Workplace injury rates across 1,087 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,087
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
17,239
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
1,087
employers reporting
17,239
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) sector (NAICS 488190) encompasses 1,087 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 17,239 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 9 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Las Mx Las Vegas, NV C 3.9
DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu Pt Mugu, CA C 3.9
Signature Flight Support Winston-Salem Winston-Salem, NC C 3.9
HAECO Americas - GSO Greensboro, NC C 3.9
Signature Flight Support Sioux Falls Sioux Falls, SD C 3.9
AFW Haslet, TX C 3.9
Ctp - Beale Afb, Ca Beale Afb, CA C 3.9
Signature Flight Support San Diego San Diego, CA C 3.9
Omni-Serv LLC - 634 Frelighuysen Ave Newark, NJ C 3.9
SFO-161 San Francisco, CA C 3.8
IAD Dulles, VA C 3.8
SFS Austin, TX-221AUS Austin, TX C 3.8
Customs Border Protection Oklahoma Oklahoma City, OK C 3.8
Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai Chicago, IL C 3.8
Signature Flight Support SJC San Jose, CA C 3.8
DI - Joint Base Andrews (VIPSAM) Andrews Afb, MD C 3.8
ACS_MIAMI_FL Miami, FL C 3.8
CA010 Edwards Afb, CA C 3.8
MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - Tucson Service Center Tucson, AZ C 3.8
IND-ITP Indianapolis, IN C 3.8
STS Line Maintenance - MCO Orlando, FL C 3.8
Den Denver International Airport Denver, CO C 3.7
SEA Sea-Tac, WA C 3.7
ORD Chicago, IL C 3.7
Textron Aviation - CSC New York Newburgh, NY C 3.7
Laxcx00po Lax- Polar Los Angeles, CA C 3.7
Byerly Aviation Peoria, IL C 3.7
IAero Tech Miami, FL C 3.7
SFS Orlando-208MCO Orlando, FL C 3.7
2967-CA103 Baldwin Park, CA C 3.6
BWI-GH Baltimore, MD C 3.6
10 Kalitta Air LLC-1573mi1 Oscoda, MI C 3.6
2073-ASA-20730100-MX Atlanta, GA C 3.6
ST Engineering Aerospace Pensacola, FL B 3.6
Elliott Aviation MLI Milan, IL B 3.6
Duncan Aviation - Kalamazoo Kalamazoo, MI B 3.6
Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, MIA, Miami Int'l Airport Miami, FL B 3.6
Lockheed Martin Corporation Luke AFB AZ 141st Ave (1898) Luke Air Force Base, AZ B 3.6
ICT-GH Wichita, KS B 3.5
TAC Air - BUF Cheektowaga, NY B 3.5
CVG-GH Hebron, KY B 3.5
DI - T44/34/6 CLS NAS Pensacola Pensacola, FL B 3.5
Airborne Tactical Advantage Company - Point Mugu Point Mugu, CA B 3.5
Unical MRO San Bernardino, CA B 3.5
Sw-20730030-Mx Fat - Fresno, Ca Fresno, CA B 3.5
Engineering : Victorville, CA Victorville, CA B 3.5
MCO Orlando, FL B 3.5
SFS Hilton Head-237HXD Hilton Head Island, SC B 3.5
DI - T44/34/6 CLS NAS Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX B 3.5
CLE-ITP Cleveland, OH B 3.5
← Prev Page 9 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.