Industry profile · NAICS 488190

Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)

Workplace injury rates across 1,087 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,087
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
17,239
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
1,087
employers reporting
17,239
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) sector (NAICS 488190) encompasses 1,087 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 17,239 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 10 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Business Aviation : Springfield (SPI) Springfield, IL B 3.5
Constant Aviation- CLI, Interior Shop Middleburg Heights, OH B 3.4
Goodrich - Wheel and Brake Service - Freeman Santa Fe Springs, CA B 3.4
ACS_DULUTH_MN Duluth, MN B 3.4
Signature Flight Support Bullhead City Bullhead City, AZ B 3.4
Di - Cal Fire Mcclellan, CA B 3.4
IND Indianapolis, IN B 3.4
M1 Support Services Columbus AFB, MS Columbus Afb, MS B 3.4
Aviation Trechnical Services Kansass City Kansass City, MO B 3.4
HRG Aerostructures LLC Miami, FL B 3.4
MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - West Virginia Air Center Bridgeport, WV B 3.4
Tyonek Services Group Inc. Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL B 3.4
Cft Fort Polk, La Fort Polk, LA B 3.4
John Bean Technologies Corporation DFW-E Fort Worth, TX B 3.4
Lockheed Martin Corporation Edwards Air Force Base (1466) Edwards Air Force Base, CA B 3.4
Aerospace Quality Research and Development 145 Addison, TX B 3.4
WA033 Oak Harbor, WA B 3.4
CA028 Palmdale, CA B 3.4
2967-FL102A Doral, FL B 3.4
Sw-20730207-Mx Msp - Minneapolis Minneapolis, MN B 3.4
3025_6150 Rockford, IL B 3.4
SkyFuel Aviation Services, LLC Orlando Orlando, FL B 3.4
Signature Flight Support 256-MHT Manchester, NH B 3.3
Triumph Airborne Structures Hot Springs, AR B 3.3
SFS Manchester 256-MHT Manchester, NH B 3.3
3025_5842 Bensenville, IL B 3.3
Western Aircraft, Inc. Boise, ID B 3.3
CO - Colorado Springs Colorado Springs, CO B 3.3
Textron Aviation - CSC Sacramento Sacramento, CA B 3.3
Moses Lake, WA Moses Lake, WA B 3.3
DAL Dallas, TX B 3.3
Signature Flight Support Fresno MRO Fresno, CA B 3.3
ANC-AFSC Anchorage, AK B 3.2
SFS Savannah-045SAV Savannah, GA B 3.2
Thales Avionics Inc - JFK Line Station Jamaica, NY B 3.2
AeroRepair Corp TX Dallas, TX B 3.2
MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - Component Repair & Overhaul Bridgeport, WV B 3.2
DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) Houston, TX B 3.2
AVMATS Jet Support Chesterfield, MO B 3.2
DFW Dallas, TX B 3.2
Textron Aviation Orlando Service Center Orlando, FL B 3.2
Lih Lihue Airport Lihue, HI B 3.2
Chromalloy Georgia - LaGrange Lagrange, GA B 3.2
MS - Virginia Beach - VA - 5OCVA Virginia Beach, VA B 3.2
DI - Joint Base Andrews (Executive Wing) Andrews Afb, MD B 3.2
VNY Van Nuys, CA B 3.2
Tucson Service Center Tucson, AZ B 3.2
Omni-Serv LLC - Ewr 3 Brewster Rd Newark, NJ B 3.1
Signature Flight Support Teterboro Teterboro, NJ B 3.1
DCA Arlington, VA B 3.1
← Prev Page 10 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding)?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.