Industry profile · NAICS 221113

Electric power generation, nuclear

Workplace injury rates across 105 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

105
Employers
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
437
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Electric power generation, nuclear average 0.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

0.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
105
employers reporting
437
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Electric power generation, nuclear Safety Data Reveals

The Electric power generation, nuclear sector (NAICS 221113) encompasses 105 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 437 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 0.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Electric power generation, nuclear that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Catawba Nuclear York, SC A 0.1
McGuire Nuclear Huntersville, NC A 0.1
Waterford 3 Killona, LA A 0.1
North Anna Pwr Sta Mineral, VA A 0.1
Clinton Power Station Clinton, IL A 0.1
Limerick Generating Station Pottstown, PA A 0.1
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Glen Rose, TX A 0.1
Robinson Nuclear Plant Hartsville, SC A 0.1
Surry Pwr Sta Surry, VA A 0.1
FirstEnergy Nuclear Support Akron, OH A 0.1
N Anna Pwr Sta Mineral, VA A 0.1
Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station Shippingport, PA A 0.1
Nine Mile Point (NMP) Nuclear Station Oswego, IL A 0.1
Palo Verde Generating Station Tonopah, AZ A 0.1
Harris Nuclear Plant New Hill, NC A 0.1
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. Burlington, KS A 0.1
Susquehanna Nuclear Berwick, PA A 0.1
Beaver Valley Shippingport, PA A 0.1
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Tonopah, AZ A 0.1
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company Wadsworth, TX A 0.1
Nextera Energy Point Beach Nuclear Plant Two Rivers, WI A 0.1
Millstone Nuc Waterford, CT A 0.1
Wolf Creek Generating Station Burlington, KS A 0.1
Oconee Nuclear Seneca, SC A 0.1
Davis Besse Oak Harbor, OH A 0.1
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Perry, OH A 0.1
Brunswick Nuclear Plant Southport, NC A 0.1
Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera Warrenville, IL A 0.0
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Ontario, IL A 0.0
Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square Kennett Square, PA A 0.0
Constellation Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square Kennett Square, PA C 0.0
Constellation Power Labs Coatesville, PA C 0.0
PVNGS Tonopah, AZ C 0.0
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Oak Harbor, OH C 0.0
United Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant Project Newport, MI C 0.0
AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Radiation Protection Steedman, MO C 0.0
Duane Arnold Energy Center Palo, IA C 0.0
PBN NextEra Energy Point Beach LLC Two Rivers, WI C 0.0
PDA Duane Arnold Palo, IA C 0.0
Vc Summer Power Station Unit 1 Jenkinsville, SC C 0.0
Nnob Vcsn Units 1 2 3 Jenkinsville, SC C 0.0
AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Leadership Team Steedman, MO C 0.0
AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management Steedman, MO C 0.0
Harris Energy and Environmental Center New Hill, NC C 0.0
Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility Kings Mountain, NC C 0.0
Harris Energy & Environmental Center New Hill, NC C 0.0
80X - Nuclear - Leadership Team Steedman, MO C 0.0
80B - Nuclear - Operations Steedman, MO C 0.0
80G - Nuclear - Maintenance Steedman, MO C 0.0
8LC - Nuclear - Work Management Steedman, MO C 0.0
← Prev Page 2 of 3 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Electric power generation, nuclear?

This sector averages 0.5 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.